Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Good stuff...
before i start into my argument i just wanted to say that the state testing i a f***ing joke. just because u "passed" or "exceeded" some fatasses expectations doesnt make u smart or stupid. now, back to my original idea which i aparently havent even started typing about. im doing my essay on whether hunting is harmful to the enviornment/animals and i just have to say it is not. according to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, only 1% of all big game DEATHS, not the entire population, but DEATHS of big game animals is a result of hunting. that means 99% of the animals are dying some other way(in other words, we aint killin em all). and i could continue to list facts and data about this subject but that would be basically giving away my essay. so i'll stop there. and i would love it if people commented on this so that i could shoot thier statment down and correct em.HUNTING IS NOT A BAD THING!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
but when animals kill humans, people kill the animals. That is natural. That is nature. And that isn't something that will ever change. When we relied on hunting to feed our people, and keep your loved ones alive, it was thought as survival. However, how can you tell a man who follows the hunting laws, hunts within season, and enjoys the sport, doesn't kill it for the trophy, but for the meat, he CANT do something that has been happening for thousands of years. How can you tell this man, who has broken no laws, and follows natures path, he cant do what nature intended?
ReplyDelete